I have had a Yahoo email for years, it's my first email and it's limitless, so it's unbelievably full of crap, mostly. It is and has been my main email, though.
What that means is that I suffer through the home page on a daily basis with the unbelievably bad choices of liberal bullcrap stories and editorial choices they are so filled with.
Yes, I said "unbelievably" twice. However, it's totally believable, as they do it on a daily basis. Today's example is pretty egregious:
As soon as I saw the little blurb, I thought I was seeing things, I mean, I liked him as a presidential candidate (remember when the Republicans had 2 black male candidates and the Dems were all white?) and didn't recall that part of his career. (yes, yes, I now know that was a Trump nickname for him, so shouldn't they have capitalized it if that's what they were going for? Of course not, they wanted to minimize his credentials)
It's in a prominent part of the Yahoo homepage as well, top stories and all:
I mean, they are getting roasted in the comments, but Libs don't read the comments, they only read the headlines and think they know it all. I mean, it's not like he was the Director of the Kansas City Fed or anything (narrator: He was, in the 90s).
Hey, journalists, this is why people don't like you. You are either the ones doing this crap or you let this crap happen.
Showing posts with label journalism is dead. Show all posts
Showing posts with label journalism is dead. Show all posts
Friday, April 5, 2019
Monday, September 10, 2018
Bad Headline? You Be The Judge.
Talk about anthropomorphism:
This from Yahoo!'s home page when I went to check my emails (and grab a scale photo for my other blog).
Seriously? "Menacing behavior?"
Ugh.
This from Yahoo!'s home page when I went to check my emails (and grab a scale photo for my other blog).
Seriously? "Menacing behavior?"
Ugh.
Labels:
anthropomorphism,
bad headline,
headline,
hurricane,
journalism,
journalism is dead,
media,
weather
Friday, July 24, 2015
Have I Mentioned That Journalism Is Dead?
Journalism is dead, especially in my city.
Case in point: someone on Facebook, I think, linked to an article that they agreed with (I assume) about changing a street name here in Cincinnati. Why? T'was named after a horrible segregationist racist Vice President!!!! The horror!
I, ever trusting my instincts, thought "BS' and tried in vain to locate some research online that either corroborated or refuted the claim. The comments were, of course, hilarious and frustratingly stupid, but there was some back and forth about who the namesake actually was.
Then, when attempting another web search for truth, I found that the paper finally, after the fact was informed that the writer WAS WRONG!
I was not shocked, after all, why would the have place a few phone calls to actual historians to be sure BEFORE they published the editorial letter, right? Crazy! Actually perform journalism? Ha!
Case in point: someone on Facebook, I think, linked to an article that they agreed with (I assume) about changing a street name here in Cincinnati. Why? T'was named after a horrible segregationist racist Vice President!!!! The horror!
Original letter to the
editor: It's time to dump Calhoun Street
Calhoun
Street was named after John C. Calhoun, a two-time vice president of the United
States (under John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson), a U.S. senator from South
Carolina, and a staunch supporter of slavery and states' rights. He is credited
by many with having started the Civil War, even though he died in 1850.
I have
wondered how a major city in a free state came to name a street after such a
man, who had zero local ties. Quick searches of Google reveal that in 1828, a
city in Illinois changed its name from Calhoun to Springfield; a bike shop in
Minnesota is changing its name from Calhoun Bikes and op-eds are being
published in the Post and Courier (Charleston, South Carolina) suggesting that
it rename its Calhoun Street.
The
realignment of Taft Road and Calhoun Street in the middle of the last century
has presented a great opportunity to fairly easily drop "Calhoun" in
favor of native son, President and Chief Justice William Howard Taft.
As an
added bonus, it would be a great opportunity to more publicly feature the
statue of Taft that now stands outside the University of Cincinnati's College
of Law at the current corner of Calhoun and Clifton Avenue.
The
time to do this is now.
Jack
Martin, Clifton
Heights
I, ever trusting my instincts, thought "BS' and tried in vain to locate some research online that either corroborated or refuted the claim. The comments were, of course, hilarious and frustratingly stupid, but there was some back and forth about who the namesake actually was.
Then, when attempting another web search for truth, I found that the paper finally, after the fact was informed that the writer WAS WRONG!
Editor's note, 9:20 a.m.
Monday: Kevin
Grace, head of archives and rare books at the University of Cincinnati, says
the letter writer is incorrect: "There's no historical evidence at all for
it being named for John C. Calhoun. There is some evidence that it was named
for a Revolutionary War pensioner named Calhoun who was allocated a parcel of
land that abutted the McMillan subdivison." Military veterans were
often given the opportunity to buy land, Grace said. The street on the
south border of the UC campus was called Calhoun before John C.
Calhoun came into prominence, he said.
I was not shocked, after all, why would the have place a few phone calls to actual historians to be sure BEFORE they published the editorial letter, right? Crazy! Actually perform journalism? Ha!
Labels:
Calhoun,
cincinnati enquirer,
journalism,
journalism is dead
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




